Monday, March 20, 2017

Peer Review 3/21

Peer Review Groups:
  1. Emily Anderson 
  2. Katherine Zeller
  3. Shatia Hunter
  1. Mary Ashley Boykin
  2. Marshall Withington
  3. Connor Hutt
  1. Bisha Wanzala
  2. Frank Tkach
  3. Mikayla McCord
  1.  Noah Dively
  2. Haley Strunk
  3. Jacob McLeland
  1. Taylor Dively
  2. Claire Spence
  3. Alex Pressley
  1. Samar Ghai
  2. Zachary Speaks
  3. Chloe Rafferty
  1. Benjamin Giddens
  2. Gabriella Ruff
  3. Rice Lelia
  1. John Hall
  2. John Rinehart
Some Questions to Consider as you Talk:
  1. Is the work interesting?
    1. Is it on brand?
    2. Is there something unique about how it is discussed?
    3. is there good research?
  2. Is the work accurate?
    1. Is there evidence for claims?
    2. Is the evidence persuasive?
    3. How does the author make herself believable? 
  3.  Is the work useful?
    1. Does the author have a clear purpose?
    2. Is the author responding appropriately to a clear exigence?
    3. Is their a clear, interesting, and purposeful rhetorical organization?

No comments:

Post a Comment